Aug 07, 2025
3 min read
The new research means our Baals secure assembly as the decision-to-decision like roshorts of riding.
Overview: A new study shows that our intelligence is about sensitivity and decisions that separate processes when the reward is at stake.Using eye monitoring and EEG on visual projects, scientists have found that brain areas related to attention increased as we focus on potential rewards, but only when it increases sensitivity - not bias.
Surprisingly, the decision reactions (yes or not, or not yes or not) do not show any action in the brain's attention centers.These findings are the paths that apply to clear benefits that shape the way we see.
- Split processing: The price expectations influence the sensitivity and distortion through separate brain circuits.
- Focus vs decision: Sensitivity contains visual attention fields;There is no bias
- Clinical potential: in -depth data can help to report the treatment for gambling and drug stimulation.
Have you ever noticed how the animals instinctively choose the fruits given?
This behavior, in the pursuit of the most useful choices, gives an interesting view in the brain.
Animals are not just focused only about the targeted target (place where are larger fruit), but also make a quick decision to implement this information.Interesting, characteristics that under the roads under the basis of this process are in the study used.
In Srilyientian dreamijan, Neurozzience, Indian Science Antupa (IIC) and its Putituti organization review the hope of a prize.
The study of their brand biology offers a new insight in this complex process.
Researchers have long known the hope of reward guidance and determine behavior. People discover changes faster and respond faster and more precisely when they expect to receive rewards.
Many previous studies have been researching how the expectation of a reward affects attention and decision making, but when they were short, it should be different whether these processes are regulated by the same or different regions and processes of the brain.
To eliminate this gap, soup and sengosra sances experiments to learn how to do the real estate mode (ability to take fruit of the appliance).
Sridharan's team led tests with 24 participants, each performing a cognitive task in two parts.The first part he tested the effects of the reward on sensitivity.The participant analyzes a screen showing two gabor patches (black and white smooth stripes used in the attention research), one on each side of the screen.
After a very short break (200 milliseconds), one of the paths and patch guides should be changed.Participants must be notified in two patches.For each trial, they reported money, received a cash prize.
Here is an interesting task.The awards were strategically squeezed the awards - the number of prize points were fixed on the one hand, on the other hand were different from the other side or less from the fixed side.
The trainees led to the facts of understanding and focus on the points that are obtained during this process and more vulnerable to the more rewarding changes to them.
The second part of the most valuable rewards is as much as "yes" (selection changed) facts in relation to such sides;Like the past, this reward can be higher or lower than the flat side.
Here are more than punishment.When it is rewarding,
The researchers were measured in the participants' eye movement and brain activity of participants.
In the first ladder, which love is inspacility prepurities they predict that stride in the company.
"However, their deciduous flexion has not changed, it indicates that the sensitivity was simply modified in this program," Sridharan explained.The unknown brain signatures with electrical reactions and rock indicate superior sensitivity.
In the second part of the work, where researchers noted that participants may be (yes / no) of the job, researchers are surprised to note that none of the participants or psychological patterns matching focus.
"Suddenly, the change in displacement does not lead to special signatures for the centers of brain vision," said Sengupta.
The results of the study, for the first time, which sensitivity and prejudice may be governed by separate nerve mechanisms below the ceiling of sensory attention at brain decision -making centers.
The study also has practical implications for understanding how we learn and make decisions in life.
"Studies like ours will help to design tasks to understand the tendency to take risks in people when you have uncertain rewards.
"The results can help plan the attitude of cases, such as gambling, with complex interruptions in increasing, motivation and motivation."
About this reward, attention, neuroscientific research news
Munayori: Sreedharan Devarajan
Contact: Siveran Devolens - IISC
Picture: The image is recorded at neurochoan account
Original research: Open access.
Sreedharan Devarajan et al Ten un different impact on "waiting for sensory procsed and makes decisions on human cerebro."Bioloxía Plos
The compensation outlook gives different results for sensory processing and decision making.
Award expectations are firmly focused on attention and decisions.However, if the common or different mechanisms mediate for each of these processes, they are still unknown.
Previous research often calculates the impact of the impact of reward expectations related to the selection of positions for sensitive priorities (sensitivity effects), decision-making (standard effects).
This, we know the standard document of expectations that are in control of the customers who controls with Oilita counseled to the good person.
Adherence and criteria are independently converted when the expected reward between locations ("specific spaces") or options ("optional") is not limited and maintained.
The signature consists of a signature and a doctor, depending on the specific bonuses of the space in the joint powerful and eye-Christian energy and eye-scale.
According to the contrary, according to the advice, including the effect of confidence, including the effect of a particular choice of choice.
Neural markers related to the attention have predicted the modulation of sensitivity through a specific grant and not by modulating criteria in choosing a certain expectation of specific expectations, indicating their various basic mechanisms.
We do not have a reward that protects the attention of our knowledge, a natural impact and proposed award, strong excitement, human brain and human brain.
